Search for: "State v. Normand"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2020, 7:47 am
(Normand v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Since the ruling in Young v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:38 am
Failure to Diagnose: JUDGE ALLOWS VETERAN'S DELAYED-DIAGNOSIS CLAIMS TO PROCEED, Normand v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
And, as SDNY Judge Koetl’s recent decision in Freedman Normand Friedland LLP v Cyrulnik, 21-CV-1746 (JGK) (SDNY May 15, 2024) (discussed here), demonstrates, even the most high-profile lawyers and experts can get tripped up on the complexities associated with valuing pending contingency-fee cases. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:08 am
In addition, the Act does not address whether online marketplace facilitators qualify as dealers, an issue currently pending before the Louisiana Supreme Court under Normand v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
Devin Freedman of Freedman Normand Friedland LLP represents Young. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
