Search for: "State v. Norris" Results 61 - 80 of 384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
This morning the Court of Appeal (Jacob and Sedley LJJ and Norris J) handed down its judgment in Nokia v IPCom [2011] EWCA Civ 6.By way of back story: IPCom (described in the judgment as a “non practising entity”, i.e. a patentee with no business of its own in products covered by the patents), owned a number of patents (which it had bought from Bosch) in the field of mobile communications technology. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm by H. Scott Leviant
A class was certified.After the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:35 am by Joe Consumer
Norris is not happy about this. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:32 am by Patricia Salkin
Because Norris Patrick was a taxpayer in Brookings County, he had standing under SDCL 11–2–61. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Katharine Alexander, Olswang LLP
The orders resulting from these applications were: an unless order for non-compliance with the personal signature order, stating that unless complied with, the Prince’s defence would be struck out (Norris J on 9 September 2013). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:35 am by R.J. MacReady
Judge Womack noted that the jury in Norris's case had been instructed on a theory of transferred intent that the CCA overruled in Roberts v. [read post]