Search for: "State v. Null"
Results 1 - 20
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2013, 8:28 pm
(See Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:36 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:27 am
Tarapore & Co. [(1969) 3 SCC 562)], ONGC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 1:57 pm
Facts: This case (Pajak v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 9:45 am
The second DCA issued a nice decision in Noh v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:48 pm
Background In Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:00 am
In Elkhorn Baptist Church v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:54 pm
Second, may the federal government treat as null for federal law a state-created legal status affecting family relations? [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:24 am
Further, it states that the scope of the decision making is only "prima facie". [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:34 am
Woods v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:13 am
In a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Apple & Eve, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Supreme Court denied the State’s motion, granted the Association’s petition declaring the Memorandum null and void, and remitted the matter to the State for further action. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:48 pm
The Supreme Court held, as related to the transmission and distribution of electricity, plaintiff was “exempt from all local legislation, including but not limited to the Town Code of the Town of East Hampton, its zoning codes, permit requirements, and local enforcement of state legislation,” and that the stop work order was null and void. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 7:36 am
Consider State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Gatti v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:49 pm
Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Nei, et. al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:19 am
McElrath v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 6:00 pm
Recently, a New York State Supreme Court judge voided that legislation, noting that it conflicted with state laws governing property use.In Deborah Pusatere v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:30 am
Anonymous v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
