Search for: "State v. O'CONNOR" Results 81 - 100 of 381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Kevin Russell
On Wednesday, January 11, the Court will hear oral argument in Coleman v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 1:26 pm by Gregory Forman
Though not incontrovertible, the 2003 United States Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:20 am by Franita Tolson
I suspect that Justice O’Connor’s decision to cloak this deference in the rubric of strict scrutiny has laid the groundwork for a Brown v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm by Albert Wan
An initial review of Justice O’Connor’s seminal decision in Teague v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We touched on it a bit yesterday, but today's roundup is quite heavy on United States v.  [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:17 am by Adam Chandler
The second O’Connor story comes from the state of Nevada, where voters are considering a ballot initiative that would change the way the state judges are selected. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:39 am by Michael Rosman
Notably, the Court – again through Justice O’Connor – at least hinted at this analysis in Grutter v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:48 am by David Bernstein
No one doubts that states can ban such activity, and most have for a long time. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm by Patrick
Fontaine is too good a lawyer not to know about New York Times v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by Amanda Rice
Retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor also attended the memorial service. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:02 am by Jay P. Lechner
Judge Kozinski, with Justice O’Connor sitting by designation, ruled that the emails were protected by the First Amendment and, thus, were not unlawful harassment. [read post]