Search for: "State v. O'CONNOR" Results 121 - 140 of 381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2012, 2:44 pm by Marissa Miller
In the skit, the Justice heard arguments in the case of Baby Bear v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Dave
It was a void agreement because EM's dad clearly knew that she lacked capacity (citing Hart v O'Connor [1985] AC 1000). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Dave
It was a void agreement because EM's dad clearly knew that she lacked capacity (citing Hart v O'Connor [1985] AC 1000). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:17 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Hence, as Justice O'Connor put it in her concurrence in McCreary County, Ky. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We touched on it a bit yesterday, but today's roundup is quite heavy on United States v.  [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:10 am by Randy Barnett
United States (1997) in an opinion by Justice Scalia) and the state judiciary (in Alden v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am by Guest Author
WINER, professor of law, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz.    [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Kevin Russell
On Wednesday, January 11, the Court will hear oral argument in Coleman v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm by Nabiha Syed
And at Cato@Liberty, Ilya Shapiro previews the issues in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
But Justice O’Connor further explained that this detention authority was cabined by those law-of-war principles, too.  [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
In the United Kingdom and other Council of Europe member states, following the 1981 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Dudgeon v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:59 am by Henry Gao
THIS MEANS CHINA WILL GET MARKET ECONOMY STATUS POST 2016.Of course, O’Connor is technically correct as Art 15 NEVER EXPLICITLY state that WTO Members have to GRANT China market economy status. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Stevens was particularly critical of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s dissenting opinion, which he claims contradicted her earlier opinion in Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:18 pm by Calvin Massey
Serious evaluation of the scope of the conditional spending power is long overdue, for it remains the easiest possible device for the federal government to force states to comply with federal mandates by dangling federal cash in front of financially strapped states.  [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) The WSJ’s Jess Bravin reports on an interview with recently retired Justice John Paul Stevens in which he defended his “most unpopular opinion” — Kelo v. [read post]