Search for: "State v. Oates" Results 1 - 20 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
This blog post will discuss the termination at issue in Unifor Canada, Local 1996 v Pepsico Foods Canada (Quaker Oats Peterborough) (Young Grievance), [2022] O.L.A.A. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:03 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Testimony based on inadmissible evidence Following a not guilty plea upon an agreed statement of facts, Johnny Oates, appellant, was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Sophie Corke
These include dairy substitutes in various forms in Class 29, as well as various other specified oat-based foodstuffs in Class 30, and beverages in Class 32. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am by Dennis Crouch
The language of 15 USC 1125(a) may support a cause of action for false sponsorship, false affiliation or false designation of origin or state unfair competition if a new entrant used the mark in commercial advertising in a way that causes Quaker Oats harm. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 7:00 am by Melissa Ramos
In addition, Judge Brennan required a showing that OAT cured the problems that led to the lab’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in Commonwealth v. [read post]