Search for: "State v. Olivo"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2008, 3:39 am
Olivo, Jr. of Ward & Olivo, and B. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:25 pm
In State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:02 am
” The court pointed to Olivo v. [read post]
Shoplifting Arrests in New York While Inside a Retail Store: A Review of the New York Legal Standard
17 Jul 2013, 12:15 pm
In finding that the complaint was facially sufficient at this stage in the process (remember, the standard is not "beyond a reasonable doubt" as it is at trial), the Appellate Court was clear in its analysis: "Given the number and nature of the items allegedly concealed by defendant, the store employee's sworn allegations were sufficient for pleading purposes to satisfy the asportation element of petit larceny and the intent elements of both theft-related offenses (see People v Gasparik… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Also called Petit Larceny and often referred to as PL 155.25, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm
Olivos (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 483. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:49 am
It cited the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 2006 ruling in Olivo v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:57 am
It cannot be determined whether the payments constitute marital property, as plaintiff suggests, or whether, as defendant posits, they constitute social security bridge payments, which do not constitute a form of deferred compensation and thus are not marital property (see Olivo v Olivo, 82 NY2d 202, 208). [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:11 am
"Does the premises liability rule set forth in Olivo v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 6:36 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:53 am
One of the key cases that guide shoplifting prosecutions in New York City as well as the rest of New York State is People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:52 pm
Olivo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:43 pm
Olivos (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 483. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:44 am
(In Olivo v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 3:55 am
According to People v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:01 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 11:52 am
Roman Catholic Bishop Gregory Aymond, Martha Cotera, Sissy Farenthold, and State Representative Dora Olivo joined TCADP officials Rick Halperin and Bob Van Steenburg at the news conference. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court announced that it would hear Baze v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 3:01 am
A lesser standard when compared to a trial’s beyond a reasonable doubt, the court stated that: “Given the sheer number of t-shirts allegedly concealed by defendant, the store employee’s sworn allegations were sufficient for pleading purposes to satisfy the intent and asportation elements of the charged offense, and this even in the absence of specific allegations as to the defendant’s movements or whereabouts in the store (see generally People v… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
Hughes v. [read post]
