Search for: "State v. Ortiz"
Results 81 - 100
of 585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2008, 11:54 am
Of course, given departures and Booker variances, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2006, 3:14 am
" United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:10 pm
Under Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:45 am
Hill NAACP v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
It is not a big surprise that Ortiz v Joel J. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 11:51 am
” Ortiz v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
United States, No. 13-127, and Ortiz-Zape v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Video Software Dealers Association and Ortiz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:57 am
Under Rutledge v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 am
The US Supreme Court decided a crime-related civil procedure case involving qualified immunity in Ortiz v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 10:01 pm
In Ortiz v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:48 pm
Diaz-Reyes v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:12 pm
USA v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:01 am
Dept. 2003) and Vaval v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:06 am
Ortiz AC32597 - State v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:04 am
Ortiz v Joel J. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:21 am
State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:00 am
But I wanted to briefly break in here to note the pending federal courts/national security cases of Dalmazzi/Cox/Ortiz v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state… [read post]
