Search for: "State v. Ortiz" Results 81 - 100 of 588
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
We join the officers and directors of the State Bar in expressing our deepest sympathy. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 5:59 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of evidence — Aiding and abetting rape After inviting a 15-year-old girl, to sneak away from her house at around 1:00 a.m. on a school night, appellant Luis Bonilla Rodriguez and his friend Juan Carlos Alvarez Ortiz brought her to Rodriguez’s house, where they served her vodka until her bloodalcohol content ... [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Ortiz-Marquez, holding that dismissal without prejudice for failure to state a claim counts as a “strike” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which limits prisoners’ ability to file lawsuits without paying the filing fees. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm by Margo Schlanger
But all we got this morning was a unanimous decision in Lomax v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the venue, timing… [read post]