Search for: "State v. Outten" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2008, 5:29 am
  Outten & Golden has a sizable office in Stamford, Connecticut and represents many employees across the state. [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 9:31 am
Time will tell which of these two opinions, the one granting penalty phase relief or the one denying it, has more far-reaching impact.The panel granted penalty phase relief in Outten v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:17 am by Jon Hyman
I can’t recall the last time a case as mundane as O’Connor v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
  Anti-Retaliation Under Federal and State Discrimination & Wage-Hour Laws; Implications of Burlington Northern v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:28 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also granted class certification, for settlement purposes; approved a proposed notice to class members; and signed off on plaintiffs’ firm Outten & Golden as class counsel (Ballinger v Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc, dba Condé Nast Publications, December 29, 2014, Pitman, H). [read post]
11 May 2012, 1:29 pm by Pamela Wolf
In February, the firm filed a suit in the Southern District of New York asserting that the Hearst Corporation illegally employed hundreds of unpaid interns in violation of federal and state wage law (Wang v The Hearst Corporation, No. 12 Civ. 0793). [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Klein, an attorney with the New York plaintiff’s firm Outten & Golden, which represents the class in the Hearst case. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:29 am by Joy Waltemath
The court declined to exercise jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claim under the New York Labor Law, which was unaffected by the FLSA exemption that sent the plaintiff’s federal claims into foul territory (Chen v Major League Baseball, March 26, 2014, Koeltl, J). [read post]