Search for: "State v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp." Results 21 - 27 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 8:13 am by Schachtman
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 576 N.E.2d 28, 30, 215 Ill. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Remington Arms Co., 563 N.E.2d 397, 407 (Ill. 1990) (punitive award reversed in light of good-faith metallurgical disagreement among experts); Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987 (1991), held, "[i]t is only reasonable therefore that as between the injured user and the one who places the product on the market the latter should bear the loss. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
During his years of employment, Owens-Corning had used both chrysotile and amosite in manufacturing Kaylo. [read post]