Search for: "State v. Palmer"
Results 1 - 20
of 687
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2023, 1:22 am
The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
On Wednesday 8th March 2023 the Court will hear R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, on appeal from [2021] EWHC 3013. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:42 am
In July 2015, Mr Palmer was charged by postal requisition issued by the Secretary of State. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:54 pm
Palmer —The 2008 Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act placed strict limits on online prescribing or the use of telemedicine encounters to prescribe controlled substances. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 8:13 pm
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [5, 9, 13, 31] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine, The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its… [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
United States, Sarah Friedman on Hansberry v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
On 19 January 2023, the court accepted the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim in defamation for want of prosecution due to delay in the proceedings for two years in Usher v Palmer [2023] QDC 003. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 2:26 pm
Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 5 December 2022, Griffiths J heard the trial in the defamation case of ABC v Palmer (QB-2021-001857). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 12:57 pm
Captain Palmer’s citation reads: “The President of the United States of America takes pleasure in presenting the Navy Cross to Lieutenant Commander George Goldston Palmer (NSN: 0-63369), United States Navy, for extraordinary heroism and distinguished service in the line of his profession as Commanding Officer of the Destroyer U.S.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
” This is despite China’s National Intelligence Law which requires citizens to cooperate and assist with state intelligence work. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
Schlutt v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:20 pm
Captain Palmer’s citation reads: “The President of the United States of America takes pleasure in presenting the Navy Cross to Lieutenant Commander George Goldston Palmer (NSN: 0-63369), United States Navy, for extraordinary heroism and distinguished service in the line of his profession as Commanding Officer of the Destroyer U.S.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 12:51 pm
Palmer. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 9:45 am
See State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Valdez v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On the same day, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 1073, dismissing by a majority the appeal from the decision of Nicol J, which struck out the Appellant’s claims in libel and data protection as abuse. [read post]
