Search for: "State v. Parcel" Results 1 - 20 of 1,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 2:41 am by Family Law
Professors Naomi Cahn & June Carbone, on the GWU Law Review blog: At the core of the Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:45 am by Walter Olson
Wisconsin: is taking a sub-parcel of land compensable? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Appellate Division upheld the rezoning of a parcel from commercial to high density residential, despite the provisions of the local comprehensive plan and the failure to prepare an environmental impact statement. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Appellate Division upheld the rezoning of a parcel from commercial to high density residential, despite the provisions of the local comprehensive plan and the failure to prepare an environmental impact statement. [read post]
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:37 am by Andrew M. Ironside
The title of this post comes from this paper by Professor Mary Ziegler, the abstract of which states: In granting cert in Young v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thus, the court held that the Board’s conclusion that 21 Seabran’s parcel needed 200 feet of frontage for every 300 gallons per day of wastewater was erroneous. 21 Seabran, LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:20 am by Tracy Thomas
UPS in Historical Context Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law, has posted Choice at Work: Young v. [read post]