Search for: "State v. Parmar"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2018, 4:46 pm
A Reply to Graffin and Mavronicola Vladislava Stoyanova, Causation between State Omission and Harm within the Framework of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights Lourdes Peroni, The Protection of Women Asylum Seekers under the European Convention on Human Rights: Unearthing the Gendered Roots of Harm Domenico Carolei, Survival International v World Wide Fund for Nature: Using the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises as a Means of Ensuring NGO… [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 9:37 am
Facts: This case (Pennington v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 9:37 am
Facts: This case (Pennington v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
It also stated that Dr. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Williams v Parmar & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2021) UKUT 244 (LC) We knew that the Upper Tribunal has been itching to get an appeal on the approach to the assessment of the amount of a rent repayment order, ever since Ficcara v James, apparently being keen to make the point that ‘the full rent’ was not a starting point in the criminal sentencing sense, as it could not go up beyond that according to landlord conduct. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Kelley III, Truth or Consequences (the Deadly Kind): Oath Swearing in Nigerien Customary Law, 47 North Carolina Journal of International Law 331-370 (2022).Ethan Szumanski, The Future of the Freedom of Religion on State No-Aid Provisions: The Effect of Espinoza v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 4:55 pm
The court cited Gichuru v. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Does this mean, as ruled in the Physical Research Laboratory v K.G. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Does this mean, as ruled in the Physical Research Laboratory v K.G. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
As per Williams v Parmar, an award of 100% should be reserved for the most serious cases (at least when section 46 Housing and Planning Act 2016 did not apply). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
In today’s case (Parmar v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
The FreeCycle Network (IPBiz) (IP Spotlight) District Court E D North Carolina grants defendant summary judgment on federal and state law trade mark infringement claims in The Daniel Group v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Michelle Donelan has refuted a reported pause on consideration of the proposed Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
& P.E.I.R. 316, or a parking lot, as in Parmar v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:47 pm
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report had a post “New York State imposes a $1.5 million penalty in cybersecurity breach case”. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
EgyptSaeed Ahmed Hassan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:25 am
Alasaad v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 1:39 pm
Haddad v. [read post]
