Search for: "State v. Patterson" Results 61 - 80 of 858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Julie Lam
For purposes of preemption, “it is the activity being regulated rather than the actor who is being regulated that matters …”  On May 25, 2010, the Court of Appeals published its opinion in Patterson v Citifinancial Mortgage Corp, No. 287370, affirming the trial court’s decision that plaintiffs’ claims against a national bank regarding mortgage transactions were preempted under federal law. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 4:07 pm
Patterson in courtroom 24 of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl St., New York, NY 10007. read more [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:20 am
 Does that mean that (1) the request should be denied, (2) that the judiciary can decide whether to deny the request, or (3) that only the State Department gets to decide whether to deny the request.The Ninth Circuit says it's (3).Which is exactly my view of the language as well. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 6:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals disagrees and the case returns to the criminal docket.The case is United States v. [read post]