Search for: "State v. Patterson" Results 61 - 80 of 876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 11:16 am by Record on Appeal
Today, April 19, 2011, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument on rehearing in a case styled Severance v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 3:11 pm by Racine Olson
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Julie Lam
For purposes of preemption, “it is the activity being regulated rather than the actor who is being regulated that matters …”  On May 25, 2010, the Court of Appeals published its opinion in Patterson v Citifinancial Mortgage Corp, No. 287370, affirming the trial court’s decision that plaintiffs’ claims against a national bank regarding mortgage transactions were preempted under federal law. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:20 am
 Does that mean that (1) the request should be denied, (2) that the judiciary can decide whether to deny the request, or (3) that only the State Department gets to decide whether to deny the request.The Ninth Circuit says it's (3).Which is exactly my view of the language as well. [read post]