Search for: "State v. Paulson" Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 6:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Moreover, as a savvy investor, Paulson only wanted to bet against the securities with the greatest risk of default, those full of:   borrowers with low credit scores, variable mortgages, and mortgages issued in states already beginning to suffer the worst of the housing crisis. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 9:43 am
Merging the CFTC and SEC will of course take legislation, but note Paulson's European view on rules v. standards: "The market benefits achieved in the futures area should be preserved and we do not want to lose the CFTC's principle-based process for market exchange oversight. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:42 am
American Council of the Blind v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:00 am by Benjamin Hager
”  Emphasizing its transaction fee of only $15 million, Goldman stated it lost more than $90 million on ABACUS 2007-AC1. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 6:32 am
  There's already a shareholder derivative action pending in the North Carolina Business Court over the Bank of America/Merrill Lynch merger, Cunniff v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 8:15 am
The Honorable John Roberts, Jr.Supreme Court of the United StatesOne First Street, NEWashington, D.C. 20543     Re:  Lauren Paulson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:15 am by Calvin Massey
Surely the State has no right to cleanse public debate to the point where it is grammatically palatable to the most squeamish among us. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Ken Paulson of the First Amendment Center has an op-ed in USA Today about Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:07 pm by Amir Efrati
If ACA knew Paulson was bearish, that “could bolster Goldman’s defense that nobody was misled here,” said Peter Henning, a law professor at Wayne State University. [read post]