Search for: "State v. Peacock" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
In my judgment the reasoning of the House of Lords in Fahia (R v Harrow LBC, ex p Fahia(1998) 1 WLR 1396, HL) provides no basis for that contention, nor did the Court of Appeal in Begum (R. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:57 am by Giles Peaker
I accept Mr Peacock’s (for Westminster) assessment that this was not, however, entirely different to the principles that were applied in Hotak. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
R v Peacock: Michael Peacock was charged under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Lucia v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:35 am by Steve Hall
  An extended excerpt:Freddie Peacock of Rochester, New York, was convicted of rape in 1976. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
Peacock, for example, has called it a “draconian” measure that has “effectively put states into ‘administrative receivership,’ undermining principles of federalism at their most fundamental level. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:56 am by SHG
Proud as peacocks, they are. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm by Charon QC
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
With its concrete facade, it has been likened to a peacock or called “Fort Book” and has been praised or derided as brutalist architecture. [read post]