Search for: "State v. Peats" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2016, 8:39 pm by Consuella Pachico
Supreme Court ruled in, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 8:33 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:36 am by J
R (Peat and others) v Hyndburn DC [2011] EWHC 1739 (Admin) is the first successful challenge to a selective licensing scheme. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:36 am by J
R (Peat and others) v Hyndburn DC [2011] EWHC 1739 (Admin) is the first successful challenge to a selective licensing scheme. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 4:39 am by Jon Hyman
Tomorrow, I start my march toward a four-peat, with a post on the Supreme Court’s oral argument in Vance v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 9:45 pm
Eva Kassoti, Unilateral Legal Acts Revisited: Common Law v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:26 pm by David Smith
R (Baron, Peat & Othrs) v Hyndburn District Council, Administrative Court, Manchester District Registry, 14 April 2011 (Not on BAILII as yet)J has previously alluded to this case involving an application for permission for Judicial Review of a local authority decision to make a selective licensing designation. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:02 am by David Markus
And when the sole opinion of the day was read from the bench, in a rollicking appeal about when an agency action is reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act, in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:18 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
By contrast, Rule 9(b) requires that “a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake.”  [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:19 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
By contrast, Rule 9(b) requires that “a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake.”  [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 10:21 am
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler, 977 F.Supp. 654, 658 (S.D.N.Y.1997), aff'd 173 F.3d 844 (2d Cir.1999) (citing McGregor v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 8:30 am by azatty
Later, to complicate things, the Catholic Church tweaked the calendar again, baffling us and showing what can happen in church–state mashups. [read post]