Search for: "State v. Pennzoil Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2009, 9:01 pm
Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:47 pm
Christopher & Banks Comprehensive Major Medical Plan Download Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:38 pm
Vail, 430 U.S. 327, 336 n.12 (1977), or the requirement to post a bond pending appeal, Pennzoil Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:50 pm
#13: Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 8:14 am
Finally, just in case you don't know, the grounds for Younger abstention are when the when the requested relief would interfere: with an ongoing state judicial proceeding; that implicates an important state interest (see Pennzoil Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:30 pm
”)(citations omitted) see also Chevron Corp. v Pennzoil Co., 974 F.2d 1156 (9th Cir., 1992)(“The privilege which protects attorney-client communications may not be used both as a sword and a shield. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:16 am
See Pennzoil Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
,ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:36 am
Pennzoil Co., 974 F.2d 1156, 1162 (9th Cir. 1992)). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Bill Kelly Co., 849 S.W.2d 380, 384 (Tex. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
” Pennzoil–Quaker State Co. v.United States, 511 F.3d 1365, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 7:31 am
Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
Pennzoil Products Co., 305 F.3d 368, 372-74 (5th Cir. 2002) (not an FDCA case); Dial A Car, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 am
In a new case, Sprint Communications Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
” Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am
Juror Number One v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Where intention is clearly stated or evident, the analytical focus generally turns to whether the inchoate or unresolved aspects of the parties’ agreement are &ld [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
