Search for: "State v. Perez"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2024, 12:35 pm
(Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction; Indian Civil Rights Act (ICRA)) Perez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
Here's a snippet:"In United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
(Background.)In Perez v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:02 pm
This post was authored by Sebastian Perez, Esq. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 7:25 am
The Court of Appeals sustains the verdict.The case is Hundley v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 5:12 pm
Learn what’s happening across the United States and how you can get involved with our panel featuring EFF Staff Technologist Daly Barnett, EFF Associate Director of Legislative Activism Hayley Tsukayama, EFF Staff Attorney Jennifer Pinsof, and Adri Perez. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 1:19 am
United StatesBook People Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Perez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
” Perez v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 2:36 pm
" First, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 1:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
The Supreme Court mentioned agencies’ obligation to respond to “significant comments” in Perez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
” Similarly, the Heritage Playbook states, without explanation, that all the TPS designations should be ended. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:27 am
This case was dismissed because the plaintiff was unable to show his whistleblowing was protected under this statute, intended to protect against Wall Street financial abuses.The case is Katzel v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 3:40 am
Video below: Thousands take part in LGBTQ+ Pride march in Jerusalem Since Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
PEREZ and SIRKKA PEREZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:13 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
Wanda Little Fenimore, The Rhetorical Road to Brown v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:43 am
Not sure why United States v. [read post]