Search for: "State v. Perez"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
That brings us to Perez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am
§551(5); see Perez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:16 am
In April 2020, the Fifth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS Voters in seven states weighed in on key contests in Tuesday’s primaries. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:59 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm
Perez (Cultural Resources; Native American Graves Protection Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Matter of Welfare of Children A.J.J. ( Indian Child Welfare Act; Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act) In re M. [read post]
18 May 2022, 6:42 am
For a good summary of how these claims work, see Kelleher v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:09 pm
” Perez Slip op. at 10. [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:23 am
Perez (N.D. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am
Cal.) in Weiss v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:00 am
In Weiss v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 10:02 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:00 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:55 am
In Álvarez Ramos v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 8:55 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:55 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
