Search for: "State v. Perry" Results 141 - 160 of 2,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 7:11 pm by Peter Tillers
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in an eyewitness identification case, Perry v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:45 am by Susan Brenner
The shot hit Perry's upper leg near his waist and broke his femur, taking Perry directly to the ground. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm by Florian Mueller
Due to the unforeseen unavailability of a panel member, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had to postpone the Epic Games v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm by Marty Lederman
Perry, and twenty-six topside amicus briefs (not including that of the Court-appointed amica) have been filed in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 5:08 am
Here is the abstract:This short essay comments on the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Bowles v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:05 am
Approval of a plaintiff's request that the federal district court dismiss his or her then pending lawsuit may bar later reinstating the action Perry v Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania State Police, Ca3, Docket #08-2884Bonita Perry appealed from an order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denying her motion to reopen her case alleging claims against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ("Commonwealth") under the… [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:03 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Supreme Court’s landmark decisions regarding same-sex marriage in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
One reviewer of the episode wrote: Perry cites a real case, State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:08 pm by Jason Mazzone
(Perhaps that outcome will produce a new round of equal protection litigation against the state for allowing some same-sex marriages to go forward but prohibiting others; the state can offer up as its rational reason for its distinction the mandate of Perry v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am by Transplanted Lawyer
  Legal libertarians read it to say that the rights are inherent in the people, not in the state, and therefore the state must justify its actions in all cases. [read post]