Search for: "State v. Peters" Results 1 - 20 of 5,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On 17 April 2024, the Court of Appeal of the UPC handed down its decision concerning the language of proceedings in the (undoubtedly ground-breaking) case of Curio Bioscience v 10x Genomics. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Hodge, Jr., JD, LLM, is the Peter Kiewit Foundation Professor of Law and Director, Center for Public Health Law & Policy, at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University (ASU). [read post]
On 23 April 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the appeal arising from the January 2023 decision of Meade J in AIM v Supponor [2023] EWHC 164 (Pat). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
In an article for the Yale Journal on Regulation, Peter Molk, a Professor of Law at The University of Florida Levin College of Law, and Adriana Z. [read post]
Osha€ 174 Enforcement of Decisions of the Unified Patent Court: A Survey of Participating Member States by Christof Augenstein and Johanna Flythstrom€ 123 [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:21 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Court next rejected the accountant’s argument that Ellen was incapable of stating viable negligence and aiding and abetting claims because the Diner’s financial statements, had she read them, would have fully disclosed the fraud to her. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  In this regard, precedent from the United States Supreme Court, in Ruckelhaus v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]