Search for: "State v. Peters"
Results 321 - 340
of 5,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
6 May 2023, 7:18 am
From RB v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:48 am
The Regulation is not attempting to establish full transparency, but significantly improve the current state of transparency (or lack thereof) regarding essentiality of patents that are sought to be licensed. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:16 am
His Honour Judge Hacon handed down judgment in AutoStore v Ocado on 30 March 2023. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am
Almost thirty years ago, Peter Edge published The Missionary’s Position After Kokkinakis v Greece: in Ossewaarde, the ECtHR returned to the matter… Background In Ossewaarde v Russia [2023] ECHR 225, Mr and Mrs Ossewaarde were US citizens living in Oryol, Russia, on a permanent residence permit. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:49 am
Case date: 09 March 2023 Case number: No. 22-1907 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
John the Evangelist Killingworth, supra, in which the Chancellor stated: “[53]. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm
Here are a couple of the more unexpected examples that are up on YouTube as I write this: An AI-generated vocal of Family Guy’s Peter Griffin singing “No Surprises” by Radiohead. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am
Many other states, including California, Nebraska, Illinois, and Florida, have similar statutes. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 5:37 am
” As the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit stated in Univ. of Florida v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Mr Bloom’s brief was to make recommendations to the Secretary of State on how government should engage with faith groups in England. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:23 pm
Erin Murphy, counsel in Barnett v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am
In this regard, in its judgment of 12 December 2013 (case C-493/12, Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences), the CJEU made the following observations: “30. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:50 pm
v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
" NLRB v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:04 pm
In Penalty Kick Management Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:49 pm
Peter Koral lives in California, and he's rich. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
Dominion v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:45 am
But if a court can determine that an offer is not FRAND, it presumably could also state wh [read post]
