Search for: "State v. Peters" Results 581 - 600 of 5,748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:07 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Less than four months before the launch of the new system, Kluwer IP Law interviewed Véron and asked him how it all started. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
  In Meadows v Khan and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton, the Supreme Court set out a six-part test for determining a damages claim for the tort of negligence. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The prevailing state of the law remains unsettled, with no explicit appeals court guidance to be found. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Webber, Peter Moulton, Martin Shulman and John Higgitt, also reversed Bannon’s ruling to the extent it had dismissed three other claims in Kirby’s lawsuit, all for various alleged Carlo’s Bakery and Pernini violations of state Labor Law. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The only no vote was by Peter Yates of New York. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Anderson sat down with professors Chimène Keitner and Ingrid Wuerth to discuss oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:37 am by Mavrick Law Firm
”  Myers, M.D. cited in support, precedent from the United States Supreme Court in Granfinanciera, S.A. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 4:51 am by jonathanturley
It appears to follow Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s test for pornography in his concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. [read post]