Search for: "State v. Petersen" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2016, 7:08 am by John H Curley
Declining to adopt the reasoning of the Alaska Supreme Court in Petersen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:37 am
The prisoner had complained that officials only permitted him to practice his Wiccan religion in his residence dormitory, and not outside it, out of concern about reaction from Christian prisoners.In Petersen v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 10:02 am by Jason C. Brown
That statute, coupled with the 1981 Minnesota Supreme Court decision in Nice-Petersen v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 5:29 am
Related: Nursing home found at fault after woman dies, Duluth News Tribune, September 16, 2010 Medication Errors, Nursing Home Injury Laws Fixed Minidose Warfarin and Aspirin Alone and in Combination vs Adjusted-Dose Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (PDF) by Annette Lemche Gulløv, MD; Birgitte Gade Koefoed, MD; Palle Petersen, MD, DMSc; Trine Sander Pedersen, MD; Ellen Damgaard Andersen, MD; John Godtfredsen, MD, DMSc; Gudrun Boysen, MD, DMSc,… [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
Petersen, 85 N.J. 638, 645 (1981) (reiterating the desirability of “[v]oluntary accommodations regarding matrimonial differences”); Ozolins v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:32 am by James J. Gross
” – Maryland Court of Appeals citing Divorce and Separation, by Nelson, in Fleegle v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
 The 1709 Blog carries the results of the black-crested macaque selfie sidebar poll, which turned out to less exciting than some of us had hoped, on account of so many people agreeing that no copyright existed at all in works created by animals [this Kat wonders whether this might be another nail in the much-cited dictum of Petersen J in University of London Press Limited v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch. 601 that "what is worth copying is prima facie… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am by Michael Scutt
  However, in another German case before the ECJ, Petersen v Berufungsausschuss fuer Zahnaertze fuer den Bezirk Westfalen-Lippe it was not justifiable for a maximum age of 68 to be imposed on doctors and dentists practising in the state medical system where it was alleged that the rule was necessary to protect patients from a decline in performance as doctors and dentists got older: no such age limit existed in the private sector. [read post]