Search for: "State v. Peterson" Results 401 - 420 of 671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2020, 9:09 am by Cyberleagle
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Peterson v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) referred from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v… [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 pm
Cir. 2007), evidence "that the prior art teaches away from the claimed invention in any material respect," In re Peterson, 315 F.3d 1325, 1331 (Fed. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am by Wolfgang Demino
" Law Research Serv., Inc. v Crook, 36 AD2d 912, 912 (1st Dept 1971)(no long-arm jurisdiction over out-of-state attorney whose only connection to the state is that he hired New York attorney to represent his client in a Texas proceeding).This situation is markedly different from other cases finding jurisdiction based on the engagement of a New York lawyer or law firm by an out-of-state entity. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
 The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Jessica Smith
Here are the cases: Proceedings to determine probable cause Peterson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:00 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
In re Grand Jury Subpoenas 89-3 & 89-4, 902 F.2d 244, 249 (4th Cir. 1990) (quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 8:19 pm by cdw
  —- (Texas Crim App 1/27/2010) (unpublished) Summary denial of postconviction application without substantive discussion Noncapital Peterson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
Peterson, CFLS A November, 2016 appellate decision in California (Cassinelli), coupled with a May, 2017 United States Supreme Court decision (Howell), seemingly forecloses all meaningful enforcement avenues in California for aggrieved spouses of former military members whose divided share of community military pension benefits has been diluted or eliminated by the latter party’s unilateral, extra-judicial election to receive VA disability benefits (thereby waiving… [read post]