Search for: "State v. Peterson" Results 81 - 100 of 600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2022, 1:28 am by Jani Ihalainen
This writer is woefully behind the times in writing about this decision, but it does merit belated discussion and is a very important decision to keep in mind in relation to intermediaries.The case of Frank Peterson v Google LLC (along with another case; Elsevier v Cyando) concerns Nemo Studio, a company owned by Mr Peterson who is a music producer. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am by Alden Abbott
In other words, if antitrust is indeed the “magna carta” of American free enterprise (see United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Donahue has posted to SSRN her history-laden amicus curiae brief in FBI v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post on the recent CJEU decision in the case of Peterson v Google LLC C-682/18 and C-683/18 – a copyright case which deals with the protections given hosting platforms by the E-Commerce Directive. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Peterson v Simopoulos [2021] VCC 1080 – a defamation case in the County Court of Victoria. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources The Algorithmic Law of Business and Human Rights: Constructing a Private Transnational Law of Ratings, Social Credit, and Accountability Measures, Larry Catá Backer, The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law, Matthew McQuilla, Pennsylvania State University Artificial Intelligence and the Right to Data Protection, Ralf Poscher, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by James Romoser
The second argument of the day will be BP PLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Peterson v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) referred from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v… [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:09 am by Cyberleagle
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Peterson v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) referred from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v… [read post]