Search for: "State v. Peterson" Results 161 - 180 of 671
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
State, 47 So. 3d 297, 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
State, 47 So. 3d 297, 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 1:28 pm by Simon Lester
Interested candidates must complete a trial assignment: a summary of the GAMI v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 1:28 pm by Simon Lester
Interested candidates must complete a trial assignment: a summary of the GAMI v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:15 pm by Ronald Mann
” Relying on last year’s decision in Bank Markazi v Peterson, Gant argued that what Congress had done was improper because it “dictated the outcome of the case without changing the law. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
Peterson, CFLS A November, 2016 appellate decision in California (Cassinelli), coupled with a May, 2017 United States Supreme Court decision (Howell), seemingly forecloses all meaningful enforcement avenues in California for aggrieved spouses of former military members whose divided share of community military pension benefits has been diluted or eliminated by the latter party’s unilateral, extra-judicial election to receive VA disability benefits (thereby waiving… [read post]