Search for: "State v. Phelan"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2013, 7:30 am
The Court of Appeals reinstates the case, holding that it does not take a vicious beating to make out an excessive force claim.The case is Phelan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:02 am
Phelan, Phelan Law Offices, Cheyenne, WyomingRepresenting State: Bruce A. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Steele William B Meyer A Well-Outfitted Militia: German–American Translations of the Second Amendment and Original Public Meaning Brandon Kinney The State before the State: A Critique of New Democracy: The Creation of the Modern American State, by William J Novak Christopher Tomlins Book Reviews Russell Sandberg, Subversive Legal History: A Manifesto for the Future of Legal Education William… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, a case involving a tenured State employee, the Court of Appeals said the employer could threaten the employee with disciplinary action if he or she did not resign. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm
Phelan, The Phelan Law Firm, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Hill: Kay Lynn Bestol of Sundahl, Powers, Kapp & Martin, LLC, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Glick: Nancy D. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:22 am
South African Conflict of Law Rule for Validity of Marriage: Law of the Place of Conclusion of Marriage In the case Phelan v Phelan 2007 (1) SA 483... [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm
Phelan, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing D&L Langley Trucking: Scott E. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:22 am
McQueen contended that Currie's action for assault is barred by the “Fireman's Rule” as set out by the Court of Appeals in Santangelo v State, 71 NY2d 393. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 6:00 pm
” See Othentec Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
Phelan, 333 U. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:32 pm
On appeal, Justice Phelan of the Federal Court applied the well-established test set out in the Supreme Court of Canada decision of Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 8:53 am
Phelan, Phelan Law Offices, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellee: Gregory A. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 10:51 am
§ 3701(b). [8] See Lawson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
The Federal Court of Canada, Phelan J., dismissed the claim of copyright infringement, stating that even if Pyrrha Design owned the copyright in the designs, Plum & Posey did not infringe it.The main questions raised by the Court in this case are the following:Does copyright subsist in any of the Pyrrha Designs because they are original artistic works? [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 3:30 pm
See Frey v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
