Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 201 - 220 of 2,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on two consolidated cases, Florence v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on two consolidated cases, Florence v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Josh Blackman
We offered some tentative findings about the linguistic claims made by the majority and dissent in D.C. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Phillips' criticizing McCauley on a Facebook page for seeking this injunction. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am by Charlotte Law Library
Lyle Dennison, reporter for the SCOTUSblog (Supreme Court of the United States Blog), stated in his blog dated June 20th, 2011 that it appears that each woman in the class-action suit in Dukes v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 5:17 am by Daniel E. Cummins
As recently promised, here is the Tort Talk blog post on the Susquehanna County Court of Common Pleas decision in the Phillips case on the admission of evidence of insurance issues in a Post-Koken matter.In the case of Phillips v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
  In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:19 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate On December 29, 2011, legislation to dissolve all redevelopment agencies became effective when the California Supreme Court released its opinion in California Redevelopment Association v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:15 am by Adam Wagner
  Lord Phillips quoted with approval the following passage from Laws LJ in Thoburn v Sunderland City Council: “We should recognise a hierarchy of Acts of Parliament: as it were ‘ordinary’ statutes and ‘constitutional’ statutes. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:45 am by Dwight Sullivan
Today CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:44 pm by Sandy
In Fox Television Statements, Inc. v. [read post]