Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 261 - 280 of 2,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
One commissioner suggested that Phillips can believe "what he wants to believe," but cannot act on his religious beliefs "if he decides to do business in the state. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by Jon Hyman
When a judicial opinion starts out with a quote such as this, it’s usually not a good sign for the defendant, unless you happen to be the United Auto Workers, the defendant in Phillips v. [read post]
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:56 pm
  Interestingly, although that attorney lists her address with the State Bar (and on the docket sheet) as the address for Phillips Jessner (a family law firm in downtown L.A.), that lawyer doesn't appear on the firm's web site. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Rosalind English
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm by Jordan Bublick
  The 11th Circuit previously explained in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by Dennis Crouch
A short aside from Dennis Crouch In Phillips v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:17 am by Sandy
The Second Circuit has held that it is within the State's police power to require children to be vaccinated in order to attend public school and that such a requirement does not violate the First Amendment or other constitutional rights.Citing Supreme Court precedent, the Second Circuit held that the right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to illhealth or death.The Second Circuit further held… [read post]