Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,810
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
In this plantworker case, I represented Carey-Canada in what turned out to be one of its last cases in the United States, before filing for bankruptcy. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 2:00 am
He is an associate member of the Virginia State Bar. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
And when the court addressed the 1846 retrocession in Phillips v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Think of Walz v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a… [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
And Niina Farah of E&E News considers the implications for oil and gas development in the state. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am
In Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:46 pm
Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:03 pm
Phillips doesn’t mention that case, but he does try to reconcile his reading with Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am
Montana Department of Revenue, in which the court held last week that Montana’s exclusion of religious schools from a state-funded scholarship program for private schools violates the First Amendment, comes from James Phillips at PrawfsBlawg and Anthony Sanders at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 5:27 pm
Supreme Court decision in the case of Bostock v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:45 pm
Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Bostock cites three cases that built on Title VII’s concept of sex discrimination: – Phillips v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 11:22 am
The majority opinion in Bostock identified three decisions that also expanded the meaning of sex discrimination under Title VII: – In Phillips v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
The Court held, for example, in Phillips v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:13 pm
Monell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
Take for example, the case in Phillips v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
They warned that ruling against Phillips would brand him a bigot, akin to a racist. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:36 am
The Court’s decision, which will be referred to as Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:36 am
The Court’s decision, which will be referred to as Bostock v. [read post]
