Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 321 - 340 of 2,861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:23 pm by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
 California Courts have taken this lenient approach because ‘the law and facts to promote the beneficial purposes of the homestead legislation to benefit the debtor’” [Phillips v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
” In Schapira v Ahronson [1999] EMLR 735 Phillips L.J. described it as an “uphill task” for an Israeli newspaper to try to persuade the court that Israel was clearly the more appropriate forum to determine an action for defamation brought in England by an English domiciled claimant whose claim was confined to publication within England and Wales. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
The most time-sensitive among those cases is Trump v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm by Linda McClain
, this supposed disanalogy sets the stage for a further argument: if business owners (like Jack Phillips) or religious social service agencies (like Catholic Social Services, in Fulton) who sincerely object to same-sex marriage are denied exemptions from state or local antidiscrimination laws, they are being branded and treated as bigots argument. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 6:43 am by James Romoser
The state’s response to the Catholic diocese’s challenge is due Wednesday, and its response to the Jewish organizations’ challenge is due Friday. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
[He talked about COVID and Religious Liberty, the Second Amendment, Free Speech, and "Bullying" of the Supreme Court by U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which rested on "religious hostility on the part of the State itself," and specifically on "the Commission's consideration of Phillips' case," which the Court held "was neither tolerant nor respectful of Phillips' religious beliefs. [read post]