Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 341 - 360 of 2,857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 30 January  2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4]  The federal government had its own DOMA.[5]  But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a… [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:49 pm
United States, No. 07-5623; Phillips v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On September 30, Judge Doherty of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana handed down a decision in Vidrine v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:00 pm
However, the BRI standard for AIA trials is different from the standard used in federal district courts and the ITC, which construes patent claims in accordance with the principles that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit articulated in Phillips v. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 7:45 am by Randall Hodgkinson
YauDistrict court properly granted motion to suppress evidence (Fourth Amendment)State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:09 am by David Zaring
 In the United States, sports keiretsu work for millions of fans, in Europe the opposite appears to work just as well. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 5:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Phillips Nizer LLP v Scollar  2020 NY Slip Op 30791(U) March 13, 2020  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 154972/2017 Judge: David Benjamin Cohen is an example of how the case within a case doctrine is applied to a legal malpractice counterclaim. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm by Josh Blackman
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]