Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 481 - 500 of 2,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2021, 6:56 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
March 30, 2021 Ignelzi, J.), the Motions Court Judge in Allegheny County, Judge Phillip Ignelzi, abrogated the Judge Wettick approach for Allegheny County moving forward and adopted Judge Nealon’s approach as enunciated in Karim v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:32 am by Andrew Hamm
Dewey Phillip Bryant of Mississippi to respond to a petition asking it to decide whether the inclusion of the Confederate Battle Flag on the state’s flag violates the equal protection clause; she notes that “the move means that at least one justice is taking a close look at the case” and suggests it may be Justice Clarence Thomas, who “has shown an interest in state displays of symbols associated with racism and slavery. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:35 pm by Sme
Universal Protection Services (10th Cir., February 16, 2018) (affirming dismissal or Armour's discrimination suit for failure to state a claim: her complaint contained only speculation that Universal's conduct had discriminatory or retaliatory motive)*Nunez v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:35 am by Kevin Russell
On Wednesday the Court heard oral argument in CSX Transportation v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:44 am by Scott Bomboy
In the 7-2 decision, Justice Anthony Kennedy said in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Phillips ruled that such a claim is precluded following a plea of guilty, as is the case here. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:57 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Among the many provision in the Act is language to overrule the Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems Corp v. [read post]