Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2017, 7:18 am
The state of Oklahoma, through Attorney General Mike Hunter, joined a 20-state amicus brief led by the state of Texas in support of the petitioners, a bakery corporation and its owner, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Lord Phillips held that the term “relating to” had to be construed more broadly than the precedents suggested: There is no principle of international law under which state A is immune from proceedings brought in state B in order to enforce a judgment given against it by the courts of state C, where state A did not enjoy immunity in respect of the proceedings that gave rise to that judgment. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
Phillip J. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:31 pm
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:33 am
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General; Jill E. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:47 pm
Over a dissent from Judge Stranch, the Sixth Circuit today in Phillips v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:42 am
Affirmed.Case Name: LARRY EDWARD MAGNUS v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:18 am
Phillips, Attorney General; David L. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:31 am
Affirmed.Case Name: DOUGLAS HOWARD CRAFT v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:12 pm
Reversed and remanded.Case Name: JB v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:17 am
Nuddleman of Phillip J. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:53 am
Phillip Morris case. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 1:43 pm
Citing the Fifth District's opinion in State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:43 pm
In Phillip v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
” The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner sought the removal of the board member for displaying the Association's postcard and his "FYI" statement, contending that the member had "violated board policy and the prohibition on electoral advocacy described in Matter of Phillips v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
” The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner sought the removal of the board member for displaying the Association's postcard and his "FYI" statement, contending that the member had "violated board policy and the prohibition on electoral advocacy described in Matter of Phillips v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Lord Phillips relied on the following evidence of state practice which, in his view, pointed toward an agreement that a prosecutor can be an issuing judicial authority: (i) a number of Member States designated prosecutors as issuing judicial authorities; and (ii) this had not been the subject of criticism by other Member States, the Commission or the Council [67-76]. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:18 am
Supreme Court is set to hear the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am
Phillips, 12-544 and its prisoner-on-top counterpart Phillips v. [read post]
