Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2014, 6:12 am
In its recent decision in the case of Phillips v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:01 am
Laurel Twp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:46 am
Case Name: MAX MAXFIELD, in his individual capacity v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:44 am
Florida Dep’t of State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:44 am
Florida Dep’t of State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:20 am
Gatti v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 3:03 pm
27 Feb 2024, 7:49 am
via www.wsj.com Phillip Hamburger. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm
” This position finds strong support in one of the Supreme Court’s most famous First Amendment cases, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:06 am
Pioneer State Mut. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:22 am
Assistant to the Solicitor General Erica Ross, representing the United States, followed Phillips. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:15 pm
In Knight v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
Laing J cites Lord Sumption’s definition of harassment in 2013: “Harassment is a persistent and deliberate course of unreasonable and oppressive conduct, targeted at another person, which is calculated to and does cause that person alarm, fear or distress: see Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 78 , para 30 (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 9:22 am
Newman v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
From June Medical Services, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
From June Medical Services, LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In considering the meaning of “harassment”, Rix LJ drew upon the guidance of the Court of Appeal in Thomas v News Group Newspapers where Lord Phillips defined harassment as: “conduct targeted at an individual which is calculated to produce the consequences described in section 7 and which is oppressive and unreasonable”. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:20 am
United States v. [read post]
