Search for: "State v. Pickering"
Results 81 - 100
of 365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Pickering v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:55 am
” The social media posts, therefore, did not meet the threshold requirement established by Pickering v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:43 am
Allen (Stetson University College of Law) has published “Of Remedies, Juries and State Regulation of Punitive Damages: The Significance of Philip Morris v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:40 am
The big news from the Supreme Court yesterday was the highly anticipated decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm
The Nevada Supreme Court has upheld an earlier ruling in Bahena v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 6:58 am
Ceballos, including oral argument recordings Supreme Court's 1968 opinion in Pickering v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:57 am
For example, the principle on which Abood rests — that government has significant leeway in its dealings with citizen employees — also supports the rule of Pickering v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:11 pm
” The Circuit Court explained: “In the First Amendment context, ‘the State has interests as an employer in regulating the speech of its employees that differ significantly from those it possesses in connection with regulation of the speech of the citizenry in general,’" citing Pickering v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm
As a consequence, such speech is entirely unprotected by the First Amendment and does not even reach the balancing test under Pickering v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 11:51 pm
This state of affairs could now mean that public employers could gain constitutional rights at the expense of pubic employees. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
The Court articulates the “framework” of Pickering v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 8:12 pm
Rosado-Quinones v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:09 am
Rubinstein*NYPPL Comments: Essentially the "Pickering Balancing Test" [Pickering v Board of Education, 391 US 563] requires the court's consideration of the following:1. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:31 pm
From O'Handley v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
Good Peter recounted the events to a federal official named Thomas Pickering in 1792. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In contrast, observed the court, under the CBA an arbitrator has a range of disciplinary options that may be imposed on the wrongdoer that are much less severe than termination of employment.The New York State Bar Association has posted an article by Sung Mo Kim, Esq. addressing the impact of the Merit Systems Protection Board finding violations of the Hatch Act on the Internet at https://nysba.org/app/uploads/2020/03/HatchActKimMunicipalFall06.pdf.Other "Hatch Act" court… [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In contrast, observed the court, under the CBA an arbitrator has a range of disciplinary options that may be imposed on the wrongdoer that are much less severe than termination of employment.The New York State Bar Association has posted an article by Sung Mo Kim, Esq. addressing the impact of the Merit Systems Protection Board finding violations of the Hatch Act on the Internet at https://nysba.org/app/uploads/2020/03/HatchActKimMunicipalFall06.pdf.Other "Hatch Act" court… [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
DeStefano (07-1428) and Ricci v. [read post]
