Search for: "State v. Pickering" Results 81 - 100 of 425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2023, 4:26 am by jonathanturley
In that way, the court avoids the necessity of applying the balancing test under Pickering v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:55 am by Aaron Rubin
” The social media posts, therefore, did not meet the threshold requirement established by Pickering v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:16 am
In such a type of case, said the court, "[t]he problem ... is to arrive at a balance between the interests of the [employee] as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern and the interest of the State, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees," quoting from Pickering v Board of Education, 391 US 563. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:40 am
The big news from the Supreme Court yesterday was the highly anticipated decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:43 am
Allen (Stetson University College of Law) has published “Of Remedies, Juries and State Regulation of Punitive Damages: The Significance of Philip Morris v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm by Carter Wood
The Nevada Supreme Court has upheld an earlier ruling in Bahena v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 6:58 am by Ken White
Ceballos, including oral argument recordings Supreme Court's 1968 opinion in Pickering v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:11 pm
” The Circuit Court explained: “In the First Amendment context, ‘the State has interests as an employer in regulating the speech of its employees that differ significantly from those it possesses in connection with regulation of the speech of the citizenry in general,’" citing Pickering v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:57 am by Michael Kimberly
For example, the principle on which Abood rests — that government has significant leeway in its dealings with citizen employees — also supports the rule of Pickering v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm by Keith E. Whittington
As a consequence, such speech is entirely unprotected by the First Amendment and does not even reach the balancing test under Pickering v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 11:51 pm
This state of affairs could now mean that public employers could gain constitutional rights at the expense of pubic employees. [read post]