Search for: "State v. Pierson" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Julia Solomon-Strauss, Stephen Szrom
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 5:10 am by SHG
While the first instance where police were given qualified immunity was in Pierson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:12 pm by Kevin
But he is probably most famous—well, let’s be honest, he isn’t famous—best-known for dissenting in Pierson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:52 pm by Joy Waltemath
This shifting rationale, the appeals court explained, could be evidence of pretext (Pierson v QG, LLC, April 18. 2014, Moore, K). [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]