Search for: "State v. Pineda" Results 21 - 40 of 174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2016, 10:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Internet companies should not be able to override state law by contract when there’s a significant state policy interest in protecting state residents. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:57 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Man nearly loses home over Social Security disability problems, April 25, 2016, ABC News, By Nina Pineda More Blog Entries: Mabry v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Venkat Balasubramani
OfficeMax California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:53 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Thus, the court says that it’s possible plaintiffs state a VPPA claim based on the disclosures to Facebook. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 11:11 am by Venkat Balasubramani
“California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
(See “California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am by Steve Satterfield
  (The California Supreme Court reached this same conclusion interpreting a very similar statute in Pineda v. [read post]