Search for: "State v. Pineda"
Results 21 - 40
of 179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
See,e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:15 pm
., United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:53 pm
Thus, the court says that it’s possible plaintiffs state a VPPA claim based on the disclosures to Facebook. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 11:11 am
“California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:36 am
Michaels Stores, Inc., retailers in Massachusetts are experiencing the same wave of consumer privacy class action lawsuits filed in California after its Supreme Court issued the Pineda v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
(See “California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:46 pm
Pineda v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:58 am
Redmond v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
(The California Supreme Court reached this same conclusion interpreting a very similar statute in Pineda v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:18 pm
In 2011, the California Supreme Court held in Pineda v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:25 am
The Massachusetts court’s determination that a ZIP code constitutes personal identification information is similar to the determination in Pineda v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:25 am
The Massachusetts court’s determination that a ZIP code constitutes personal identification information is similar to the determination in Pineda v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:38 pm
Pineda v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
This opinion comes nearly two years after the California Supreme Court’s February 2011 decision in Pineda v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
(See, e.g., Boorstein v. [read post]
CA Supreme Court Holds That Song-Beverly Does Not Apply To Online Purchases For Electronic Downloads
5 Feb 2013, 1:11 pm
In Pineda v. [read post]
