Search for: "State v. Pitchford"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 5:15 am
Pitchford v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
In this case, formerly known as Quila and Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Court of Appeal held that the amendment to the Immigration Rules was disproportionate. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
This week, the Supreme Court hears the appeal in Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, which is joined with the appeals in Johnson v Solihull and Kanu v Southwark. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
English authority on the point was no different and in Harrison [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, a deportation case involving the application of Zambrano, Elias, Ward and Pitchford LJJ agreed with the Government that there is no basis for asserting that it is arguable that the Zambrano principle extends to cover anything less than a case where the EU citizen is forced to leave the territory of the EU. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
Pitchford LJ found that s 25 did not interfere with art 8 rights. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:47 pm
I do find it amusing that this motion is "State of Texas v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:16 am
So, on this ruling, a member state, has a choice. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am
Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 – Read judgment A key part of the government’s strategy to combat forced marriages, preventing people under the age of 21 from entering the country to marry, has been heavily criticised by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
When such appointments are made in the United States the judicial record of the appointee is subject to minute analysis over many months. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
This application was due to be heard on 1 February 2011 by Sedley and Pitchford LJJ. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:26 am
Elias and Pitchford LJJ agreed. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury [2011] EWCA Civ 1: read judgment. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:57 am
In 2011, a successful application for security for costs was made before Lord Justice Sedley and Lord Justice Pitchford. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
We join the officers and directors of the State Bar in expressing our deepest sympathy. [read post]
