Search for: "State v. Plain"
Results 281 - 300
of 11,768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2024, 8:59 am
Today's advance release opinions: State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 7:46 am
From yesterday's decision in Hines v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
Hidden in plain sight—in the state statutes of eight states, to be precise—are absentee-ballot-eligibility requirements that explicitly favor individuals over a certain age, and in so doing violate the unambiguous language and plain public meaning of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 11:41 am
Barnes v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 10:32 am
The parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred by: (1) holding that the warrant to search the defendant's cell phone violated the Fourth Amendment's particularity requirement, see People v Hughes, 506 Mich 512, 538 (2020); (2) failing to sever any valid portions of the search warrant from any invalid portions, see People v Keller, 479 Mich 467, 479 (2007); (3) holding that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule did not apply, see People v… [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
The Fifth Circuit ruling, in Barr v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
Estate of Caruso v Caruso is one of those cases, fought in the setting of a realty holding general partnership, that went up to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Luongo v Records Access Officer, Civilian Complaint Review Bd., 150 AD3d 13, the Appellate Division opined "Statutes should be interpreted in a manner designed to effectuate the legislature's intent, construing clear and unambiguous statutory language so as to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used".The Appellate Division's decision also held that Foundation's intended use of the requested information to contact individual… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Luongo v Records Access Officer, Civilian Complaint Review Bd., 150 AD3d 13, the Appellate Division opined "Statutes should be interpreted in a manner designed to effectuate the legislature's intent, construing clear and unambiguous statutory language so as to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used".The Appellate Division's decision also held that Foundation's intended use of the requested information to contact individual… [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 9:56 am
Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 7:17 am
Trulock v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 4:16 pm
” Zamorano v. [read post]
14 Sep 2024, 8:30 am
Supreme Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 8:59 am
In Moore v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 9:02 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 4:56 am
Cusick v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 12:14 pm
Mass.) in Gino v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 7:38 am
As we recently wrote, states’ firearms regulations have faced legal challenges across the country since the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 3:43 pm
In Utah v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 10:05 am
Senior Benefits, LLC v. [read post]
