Search for: "State v. Plain"
Results 281 - 300
of 12,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
A: takings: Sony rootkit is installed, and you’re not allowed to remove it because of the power of the state; similar to Loretto v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
US District Judge Roger Benitez based his decision on the US Supreme Court’s holding in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 8:43 am
” Red Cat Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Prohibiting a person from taking “any action to make . . . any public statement that the complaint is without factual basis” is a plain prior restraint on speech.[22] Prohibiting that same person from “permit[ting] to be made any public statement that the complaint is without factual basis” only exacerbates the problem by imposing on the defendant an obligation to restrain speech by others. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:23 pm
The plaintiff’s lead lawyer in Carroll v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:53 am
To state otherwise flies in the face of plain common sense. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 10:58 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Although the militia system has long since been superseded by a huge standing army (and navy and air force), not to speak of a vast military-industrial apparatus, that does not change the plain meaning of “invasions” in this clause – hostile armed incursions into or against U.S. territory that must be repelled with military force. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:04 am
” Cavitt v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Victoria is a state in southeast Australia. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 3:21 pm
See Bridges v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 9:21 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:37 am
Another huge relief for New York employers, the Second Department stated that the plain language of NYLL § 1981(1-a) and the law’s legislative history clearly support the conclusion that this statute addresses nonpayment and underpayment of wages, not the frequency of those payments. [read post]
