Search for: "State v. Plain"
Results 41 - 60
of 12,545
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
" Further, as the decision in Walton v New York State Department of Correctional Servs., 25 AD3d 999, modified, 8 NY3d at 191, notes, "an individual is not required to exhaust the available administrative remedy where such action would constitute an exercise in futility. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:06 pm
"] From Friday's decision in People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:53 am
"] From U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 8:05 am
” Testa v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:37 pm
On August 21, 2023, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Raines v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:35 am
Miller v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
The Copyright Act’s “Plain” Language. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
From yesterday's decision in Ohio v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:57 pm
The case is Hamilton et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Yet, while Eastern Europe is considered “too eastern to be western, too European to be southern” and scholars from the region are excluded from mainstream commentary, my forthcoming article emphasizes the arguments of local stakeholders that challenge the dominant narratives related to the aggression tribunal that have emerged since February 2022, including to counter “west(s)plaining. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:53 am
In People v Hutt, the defendant refused to let medical personnel draw his blood and refused to provide a urine sample despite a warrant authorizing these samples. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:01 am
Mbatha v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:38 am
FIRE states: An official glossary of terms released by the state makes plain that the “anti-racist” views it mandates are highly ideological. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am
"That's just called 'education.'" An official glossary of terms released by the state makes plain that the "anti-racist" views it mandates are highly ideological. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 10:19 am
Some excerpts from Sandmann v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 8:52 am
From Tuesday's decision of the Texas Court of Appeals (Amarillo) in Boes v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 3:28 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
In two previous blogs, here and here , we have discussed the United States v. [read post]
