Search for: "State v. Plain" Results 61 - 80 of 12,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
Rev. __ at 3–4, 16–18 (forthcoming 2023) (describing the MQD as a clear statement rule requiring courts “not to discern the plain meaning of a statute using the normal tools of statutory interpretation, but to require explicit and specific congressional authorization for certain agency policies”); id. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 4:53 am by Benson Varghese
For example, see DPS’s interpretation of the Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. et. al., v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:43 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[South African Iron and Steel Institute and Others v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others [2023] ZACC 18 (26 June 2023)] [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm by Laurence H. Tribe
I was discussing the specifics of Florida state law — not what federal law (or, for that matter, any other state’s law) requires or permits. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:17 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
SIJ petitioners in the state of Washington are protected by an injunction issued in the related case Galvez v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
While Florida Supreme Court Justices may not be aware of it, the readers of this blog know that appraisal rules vary from state to state. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
That standard is said to have two goals, to ‘reduce, if not annul altogether, divergences between Member States’, and to ‘highlight the (mis-)perceived freedom of several Member States when transposing EU directives into law’.If one is an unabashed fan of both the CJEU and the idea that the Common Market necessitates that all copyright laws be the same in that market down to every jot and tittle, then one would agree. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 3:17 am by SHG
The trial of the United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:21 am by Charles Sartain
It depends on context, says the Supreme Court of Texas in Finley Resources Inc. v. [read post]