Search for: "State v. Plain"
Results 101 - 120
of 12,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 1:09 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 7:45 am
Criminal procedure — Plain error review — Inconsistent witness testimony Appellant David Johnson asks us to reverse his convictions under the often-invoked-but-rarely-granted “plain error review” doctrine. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Although the Court held a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:01 am
iStock_000000701427Medium.jpg Sixth Circuit reverses conviction based on trial court's failure to clearly demark between the agents' expert and lay testimony and failure to give a cautionary instruction about the dual roles of agent's testimony, which was plain error, in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 8:34 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:25 am
The error was plain under controlling Third Circuit precedent: United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 9:31 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:49 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
« Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm
In terms of potential impact, the case of Sorrell v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:52 am
In State v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
— First Amendment to the Constitution “The phrase ‘Congress shall make no law’ is composed of plain words, easily understood. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:48 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
The officer stops the man’s car and sees the beer bottle in plain view. [read post]
27 May 2012, 10:31 pm
The Court found the “plain language” of the Real Estate Procedures Act of 1974 (“RESPA”) to be controlling in Freeman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:50 am
’State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
Finally, Wednesday's round-up also included continuing news coverage of Citizens United v. [read post]
