Search for: "State v. Plain"
Results 121 - 140
of 11,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2024, 6:15 am
In yesterday's post, I discussed Glossip v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 2:24 pm
And in the Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 8:25 am
This position finds support in State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 6:55 pm
" Apparently, the only judicial decision on the meaning of "part or parts" in the FFA was United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California wasn’t buying it (JAE Properties, Inc. v AMTAX Holdings 2001-XX, LLC, 3:19-CV-02075 [SD Cal Feb. 9, 2024]). [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 9:15 am
For the Defendant, he gave an address in San Francisco in the United States of America. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 10:21 am
” State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 8:59 am
Today's advance release opinions: State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 7:46 am
From yesterday's decision in Hines v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
Hidden in plain sight—in the state statutes of eight states, to be precise—are absentee-ballot-eligibility requirements that explicitly favor individuals over a certain age, and in so doing violate the unambiguous language and plain public meaning of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 11:41 am
Barnes v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 10:32 am
The parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred by: (1) holding that the warrant to search the defendant's cell phone violated the Fourth Amendment's particularity requirement, see People v Hughes, 506 Mich 512, 538 (2020); (2) failing to sever any valid portions of the search warrant from any invalid portions, see People v Keller, 479 Mich 467, 479 (2007); (3) holding that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule did not apply, see People v… [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
The Fifth Circuit ruling, in Barr v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
Estate of Caruso v Caruso is one of those cases, fought in the setting of a realty holding general partnership, that went up to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Luongo v Records Access Officer, Civilian Complaint Review Bd., 150 AD3d 13, the Appellate Division opined "Statutes should be interpreted in a manner designed to effectuate the legislature's intent, construing clear and unambiguous statutory language so as to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used".The Appellate Division's decision also held that Foundation's intended use of the requested information to contact individual… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Luongo v Records Access Officer, Civilian Complaint Review Bd., 150 AD3d 13, the Appellate Division opined "Statutes should be interpreted in a manner designed to effectuate the legislature's intent, construing clear and unambiguous statutory language so as to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used".The Appellate Division's decision also held that Foundation's intended use of the requested information to contact individual… [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 9:56 am
Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 7:17 am
Trulock v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 4:16 pm
” Zamorano v. [read post]
14 Sep 2024, 8:30 am
Supreme Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
