Search for: "State v. Plain"
Results 121 - 140
of 12,794
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 3:47 pm
” But, again by its plain terms, the court’s interim order applies only to Reuters and to Google. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:43 am
Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Murray v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
The Amar brothers are just plain wrong in arguing that the President holds an "office *** under the United States" under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
This is especially plain in the context of presidential elections. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
Supreme Court in the Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
A: takings: Sony rootkit is installed, and you’re not allowed to remove it because of the power of the state; similar to Loretto v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
US District Judge Roger Benitez based his decision on the US Supreme Court’s holding in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 8:43 am
” Red Cat Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Prohibiting a person from taking “any action to make . . . any public statement that the complaint is without factual basis” is a plain prior restraint on speech.[22] Prohibiting that same person from “permit[ting] to be made any public statement that the complaint is without factual basis” only exacerbates the problem by imposing on the defendant an obligation to restrain speech by others. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:23 pm
The plaintiff’s lead lawyer in Carroll v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:53 am
To state otherwise flies in the face of plain common sense. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 10:58 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Although the militia system has long since been superseded by a huge standing army (and navy and air force), not to speak of a vast military-industrial apparatus, that does not change the plain meaning of “invasions” in this clause – hostile armed incursions into or against U.S. territory that must be repelled with military force. [read post]
