Search for: "State v. Pohl"
Results 21 - 40
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2015, 8:20 pm
The main case she cited was United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:24 am
Lockhart then draws Judge Pohl’s attention to Bismullah v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
James Pohl, the presiding judge in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:47 pm
Pohl in the case USA v. al-Nashiri is now available here, and here is the substance of it: 1. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:30 am
He cites Florida v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm
CDR Mizer says that the letters are destined for the French government in connection with the M/V Limburg. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:20 am
He speaks to that briefly, and turns, at long last, to the arraignment of the accused in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am
Nevin, the SJA explained that KSM’s stated reason for not attending was that the guard force had not told him that there was a hearing scheduled for Sunday. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:09 am
Fresh from the Guantanamo security scrub: an amended docketing order for the upcoming hearing, late this month, in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
Under Crawford v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm
This prevents Bormann from discussing the records with her client, which goes against “one of the most fundamental aspects” of Skipper v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:22 am
Judge Pohl calls the session to order. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Citing U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:30 am
Judge James Pohl has tweaked the calendar in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:14 am
Fresh from a security scrub are these two items in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
And, the prosecutor continues, Al-Nashiri’s is just as robustly staffed as the defense was in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
