Search for: "State v. Pohl" Results 41 - 60 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2016, 11:50 am by Quinta Jurecic
” Rushforth argues that the motion “presents the court with a question that is simply stated but which has profound consequences: Is this proceeding governed by the Constitution of the United States of America? [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm by Francesca Procaccini
Connell has essentially two legal arguments for why Judge Pohl is emp [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:55 am by Clara Spera
For the United States, Clay Trivett, Robert Swann, Edward Ryan and Major Christopher of the U.S. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:29 pm by Nora Ellingsen
Rushforth then turns to Judge Waits’ relationship with Fred Taylor, who was previously part of the United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:09 pm by Francesca Procaccini
With this, Judge Pohl calls time and orders a recess. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm by David Ryan
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm by Yishai Schwartz
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 5:54 am by Elina Saxena
The former Secretary of State and presidential candidate outlined her national security plan against the Islamic State in a speech at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm by Elina Saxena
” He also stated that Turkish forces were in Iraq to train and equip forces fighting the Islamic State and that Turkish presence in the country was no secret. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 12:35 pm by Meg Kribble
Pohl et al.), and we’re in the process of digitizing our remaining holdings. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Citing a DC Circuit case United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:20 pm by Zack Bluestone
The main case she cited was United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am by Zack Bluestone
Nevin, the SJA explained that KSM’s stated reason for not attending was that the guard force had not told him that there was a hearing scheduled for Sunday. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:34 pm by Francesca Procaccini
Judge Pohl interjects to state the obvious and uneasy conclusion of this argument is that a pro se defendant must have access to classified information. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:44 am by Cody M. Poplin
For the first time since February, proceedings in military commissions case United States v. [read post]