Search for: "State v. Pohl"
Results 61 - 80
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2013, 11:13 am
Connell says that yes, in fact, some courts (including those in his home state of Virginia) can be quite rigid when it comes to waiver. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:36 pm
Reviewing the docket in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm
Connell has essentially two legal arguments for why Judge Pohl is emp [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:44 am
It is here that we take in the sorta-live broadcast of pretrial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:46 am
Judge Pohl states that this issue is different from federal court. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:21 am
Baker v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:30 am
Additionally, a motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:44 pm
” On April 14, 2014, Judge Pohl issued an Order in the USS Cole case, United States v. al Nashiri, stating that the government had to turn over ten categories of information relevant to Mr. al Nashiri’s time in the CIA’s RDI program, in effect revealing to the defense the entire history of his torture. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Per Sheridan, the Pennsylvania Superior Court had held in Pohl v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:09 pm
With this, Judge Pohl calls time and orders a recess. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:43 pm
Judge Pohl states that courts traditionally give a lot of deference to the facility commander on such matters. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:26 pm
The morning’s proceedings begin with a return to Al-Nashiri’s alleged role in the attack on the French oil tanker the M/V Limburg in Yemen in October 2002. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 11:39 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 7:01 am
Join us as we debate and discuss: United States v. al-Hawsawi, in which Judge Pohl rules that a military commission prosecution can proceed against an accused 9/11 co-conspirator based on conduct that facilitated (and thus occurred prior to the culmination of) the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
In particular, Kammen tells the court, he would like the court to order the use of a defense security officer (“DSO”) who is within the defense’s attorney-client privilege bubble, as like has been done in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:51 pm
Pohl et al.) took place in 1947. [read post]
