Search for: "State v. Pohl" Results 61 - 80 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2013, 11:13 am by Wells Bennett
Connell says that yes, in fact, some courts (including those in his home state of Virginia) can be quite rigid when it comes to waiver. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm by Francesca Procaccini
Connell has essentially two legal arguments for why Judge Pohl is emp [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:44 am by Wells Bennett
It is here that we take in the sorta-live broadcast of pretrial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Russell Spivak
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:46 am by Keith Gerver
Judge Pohl states that this issue is different from federal court. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:30 am by Wells Bennett
Additionally, a motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:44 pm by Wells Bennett
” On April 14, 2014, Judge Pohl issued an Order in the USS Cole case, United States v. al Nashiri, stating that the government had to turn over ten categories of information relevant to Mr. al Nashiri’s time in the CIA’s RDI program, in effect revealing to the defense the entire history of his torture. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:09 pm by Francesca Procaccini
With this, Judge Pohl calls time and orders a recess. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:43 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Judge Pohl states that courts traditionally give a lot of deference to the facility commander on such matters. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:26 pm by Matt Danzer
The morning’s proceedings begin with a return to Al-Nashiri’s alleged role in the attack on the French oil tanker the M/V Limburg in Yemen in October 2002. [read post]
2 May 2018, 7:01 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
Join us as we debate and discuss: United States v. al-Hawsawi, in which Judge Pohl rules that a military commission prosecution can proceed against an accused 9/11 co-conspirator based on conduct that facilitated (and thus occurred prior to the culmination of) the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 In particular, Kammen tells the court, he would like the court to order the use of a defense security officer (“DSO”) who is within the defense’s attorney-client privilege bubble, as like has been done in United States v. [read post]