Search for: "State v. Pohl"
Results 81 - 100
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2013, 2:04 pm
Bogdan notes the sequence of events: he initially took no remedial action, in light of Judge Pohl’s “pause” order. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
In particular, Kammen tells the court, he would like the court to order the use of a defense security officer (“DSO”) who is within the defense’s attorney-client privilege bubble, as like has been done in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court released its decision on the centuries-old Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in Kiobel v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
AE 144: Government Notice of Ongoing Command Investigation (Legal Bins) The 9/11 session will follow another hearing in the other Guantanamo capital case, United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm
Importantly, PHR filed an amicus brief in Al Nashiri v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:13 am
Connell says that yes, in fact, some courts (including those in his home state of Virginia) can be quite rigid when it comes to waiver. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm
What, if anything, do developments in the military commission case of United States v. al-Nashiri portend for Al-Nashiri v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:14 am
Fresh from a security scrub are these two items in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:56 am
Al-Bihani v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm
The defense relied on the 2008 case of Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:09 am
Fresh from the Guantanamo security scrub: an amended docketing order for the upcoming hearing, late this month, in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:30 am
Additionally, a motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:41 am
Pohl: the military commission in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
Just so y’all know: the military commission expects a more orderly affair this time around, in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
Pohl issued an amended docketing order in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:32 am
Judge Pohl’s docketing order, in which he adjusts the calendar in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:30 am
Judge James Pohl has tweaked the calendar in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
